Moderator
Posts: 2259 from 2003/2/24
Quote:
munk wrote:
FWIW, the varargs68k attribute is documented and used to be supported.
Same could be said for K&R-styled parameter passing or any other relic from the 70s....
If someone was planning to remove varargs68k from GCC2.x you'd have a valid argument, but with GCC4 which is only interesting for those that want to use "bleeding edge" C(++) revisions it just makes no sense to support 20++ year old kludges designed for systems that have limited relevance to the target architecture.
[ Edited by Kronos 28.10.2015 - 16:25 ]
