• Butterfly
    Butterfly
    munk
    Posts: 94 from 2006/3/27
    Quote:

    Kronos wrote:
    But it should still be obvious that a quirk named ???????68k ain't the latest tech when it comes to developing for MorphOS.

    FWIW, the varargs68k attribute is documented and used to be supported. As long as the MorphOs compiler is GCC based I would expect support for (all) extensions present added to GCC2.

    If there is real interest, I could provide the missing bits for varargs68k support for whatever GCC version wanted. I have the plan to offer updated GCC versions with all options and extensions available on GCC2. However, there is no time frame and I still more focused on m68k.
  • »28.10.15 - 14:43
    Profile