> That's not quite accurate. For backward compatibility,
> opcode fusion allows one operation using the encoding of two
> operations that it replaced. For example, a 3 operand add is
> encoded as move.l d1, d0; add.l d3, d0. Similarly, a
> predicated add would be encoded as beq.s label1; add.l d1,
> d0; label1: . Also, the chunky bitmap display modes are
> expected to have Cybergraphics compatible drivers under
> AROS. There will probably be either Mesa or OpenGL-ES
> drivers as well for the 3D core.

How would that relate to what I referred to, i.e. the usage of:

- "faster blitter",
- "more Chip RAM",
- "tons (for an Amiga) of Fast RAM" and
- "SuperAGA instructions"?

I don't see how a program leveraging all those features could run on an old m68k Amiga at all or at least fast enough.