> Some of these tests are MP aware (so not directly comparable to
> what we would get on MorphO).

*My* calculated results which I linked to are comparisons of the CPUs (only single vs. single and dual vs. dual, not mixed). That's why I didn't quote any benchmark points or times of the programs (we don't have those on MorphOS anyway) from the articles but only calculated the *relative* results of the CPUs (again: no mixed CPU count), which ideally shouldn't be much different from the *relative* results under MorphOS. At least that's what I thought you asked for: relative results.

> Ideally we would have some MorphOS comparisons for stuff like decoding / encoding
> video /complex web pages / games / emulation. Not easy to come up with a standard
> bench and also multiple memory / HD / video card combination makes this difficult.

Just define a set of applications and a set of data for each application (if required), open a thread here on MorphZone with your own results and there you go :-)