> Are you sure his statement really needed correction?

Yes, I am.

> He is talking about that new development computer, not about the CPU alone

Then which computer is that "5121e" supposed to be? AFAIK that's a chip, not a board.

> I guess we all here know what's a computer, and what's an individual
> computer component.

I won't bet on it. Think about why I wrote "once again" ;-)