> I don't know which Wolf does here.

I'm just pointing out some more of these (as you put it) "false accusations" against Cherrypal, done by a malignant bunch of "false accusers" who seem to be on their mission to destroy Cherrypal and discredit Max Seybold. And I think you have proof that these are really "false accusations", else you wouldn't dare to claim they are, would you? (And I believe that you just overlooked my corresponding question to you.)

> some of the legitimate complaints of users like hep-cat, whose receipt of a
> substandard computer I highlighted here at MZ some months ago. So I don't
> think I fell into that spin trap.

But according to Seybold that customer's story can't be true:

"To the best of our knowledge all impacted customers have either received their Cherrypals or got refunded by now." (a statement that you acknowledged in this very thread)

The customer you're referring to claims he didn't receive the Cherrypal Africa he paid for but a device that doesn't meet the Africa's specs. And he claims that he was promised by Cherrypal a replacement device with the appropriate specs. Furthermore he claims that he hasn't received any replacement nor a refund.
How can this customer's complaints be legitimate in the light of Seybold's April 4th statement, which you acknowledged?