> You knew that when I asked you if the links you dropped after my > comment about the MID-3G included the MID-3G that I was not asking > you if they contained "groups which include the MID-3G."
No, I didn't know that you were asking if these links contained the word "MID-3G". Groups of things include the things they consist of by definition.
> That's just a bended, specious, convenient, and intentional > misinterpretation.
No, it's simple logic.
> If I asked if your link included "cats," would you say yes because > it was a general discussion of animals and a cat is an animal?
Exactly. Dare to answer my question from 10 days ago? It went like:
One can talk about Genesi PPC mainboards refering to Pegasos I, Pegasos II and Efika only with mentioning the hypernym term "Genesi PPC mainboards". Would you really claim this didn't include either Pegasos I, Pegasos II or Efika just because these terms are not explicitly mentioned?
