> Your argument style is just to scrutinize posts on a line by line basis
Rather on a proposition-by-proposition basis.
> looking for imagined grammatical flaws in casual speech to attack
No, I tend to ignore grammatical and orthographical errors. Not being a native speaker I make enough of them myself after all.
> rather than actually engaging with the meaning of that speech.
What is the meaning of the word "buggy" you used with regard to PPC hardware, if not the presence of bugs?
> you're obsessed with the Efika's ram "not being a bug".
No, I merely stated that this is not an example of the alleged bugs you claimed.
> Nobody said it was
Then why did you mention it as an example in response to my objection of your "buggy hardware" claim?
> it was brought up as an example of how PPC Amigaish systems have generally sucked.
Then you replied to the wrong comment it seems, as my comment you replied to was objecting your "buggy hardware" claim (which you then repeated in comment #21, so apparently you really mean it).
> What does this weird grandstanding over if it's a bug or not get you?
Probably the same that your insistence on "buggy hardware" gets you.
> It's still a shit and useless amount of ram
Yes, I have the very same low opinion of the Efika's RAM amount and stated it numerous times here on MorphZone and elsewhere since its release.
> although now you'll probably [...] dispute the word "useless".
You may have lost the plot here.
> I told you I'm not interested [...]
Indeed you did, but serving your interest isn't my incentive anyway :-)
> you think doubling down on it will get me to take you seriously now.
That's not what I think. Repeating unfounded claims about buggy hardware is doubling down, I think.
