> dnetc: [...]
> AmigaMARK: [...]
> nbench: [...]
> Stream: [...]

Thank you very much for running these benchmark tests for me.
I prepared a relative comparison with my 1.5 GHz Mac mini G4. The following list shows the performance of your 2.0 GHz X5000/Cyrus/P5020 compared to my 1.5 GHz Mac mini/MPC7447A (=1.00) at the leftmost position, then the scaled per-clock performance comparison, and the name of the specific test at last position.
(NOTE: updated results with more recent MorphOS beta on X5000 here)


dnetc

1.27 | 0.96 : KOGE 3.1 Scalar
0.90 | 0.67 : MH 2-pipe
0.93 | 0.70 : KKS 2-pipe
0.93 | 0.70 : KKS 604e
0.96 | 0.72 : MH 1-pipe
0.95 | 0.71 : MH 1-pipe 604e

AmigaMARK CPU

1.29 | 0.96 : BogoMIPS ppc-assembler inline
1.18 | 0.88 : Dhrystones
1.30 | 0.98 : 40th Fibonacci number
1.13 | 0.85 : FPU query [Double Precision] - Al Aburto
1.26 | 0.95 : LibJPEG - libjpeg [v6b]
1.12 | 0.84 : Mars chiper
1.44 | 1.08 : MD5 checksuming (RFC 1321) L. Peter Deutsch
1.11 | 0.84 : MP3 -> CDDA [mpega.library]
1.28 | 0.96 : Serpent chiper
1.35 | 1.01 : ZLib functions [v1.1.4]
1.14 | 0.85 : TOTAL CPU

AmigaMARK Memory

1.28 | 0.96 : Read CPU-Cache
2.18 | 1.64 : Read FAST byte [8]
1.98 | 1.48 : Read FAST word [16]
2.00 | 1.50 : Read FAST long [32]
2.01 | 1.51 : Write FAST byte [8]
2.01 | 1.51 : Write FAST word [16]
2.07 | 1.55 : Write FAST long [32]
0.98 | 0.73 : Copy FAST 2 FAST
1.67 | 1.25 : Allocate Memory FAST
1.37 | 1.03 : Initialize Memory FAST
1.59 | 1.19 : TOTAL MEM

nbench

1.05 | 0.79 : NUMERIC SORT
1.86 | 1.39 : STRING SORT
0.96 | 0.72 : BITFIELD
1.02 | 0.77 : FP EMULATION
1.26 | 0.94 : FOURIER
1.00 | 0.76 : ASSIGNMENT
0.99 | 0.75 : IDEA
0.99 | 0.74 : HUFFMAN
1.09 | 0.82 : NEURAL NET
1.05 | 0.78 : LU DECOMPOSITION
1.10 | 0.82 : INTEGER INDEX
1.13 | 0.85 : FLOATING-POINT INDEX
1.22 | 0.91 : MEMORY INDEX
1.02 | 0.76 : INTEGER INDEX

stream

2.64 | 1.98 : Copy
2.90 | 2.17 : Scale
3.25 | 2.44 : Add
3.20 | 2.40 : Triad


As expected, one can see that in the memory performance tests (AmigaMARK Memory, stream), the X5000/Cyrus clearly outdoes the Mac mini G4. However, regarding the measured CPU performance (dnetc, AmigaMARK CPU, nbench) I must confess I'm disappointed by the QorIQ P5's e5500 core. In almost all tests, its per-clock performance is below that of the 7447A/e600, which is honestly not what I had expected. Only thanks to its faster clock rate, the P5/e5500 comes out as winner in absolute comparison in the majority of tests (except dnetc).

> monolith: [...]

Comparison result here is: 2.32 | 1.74. I'm not sure what to think of this CPU performance test.

> RageMem doesn't work atm.

Is there a general problem with OS4Emu on Cyrus?

[ Edited by Andreas_Wolf 26.04.2017 - 12:54 ]