Acolyte of the Butterfly
Posts: 124 from 2023/3/22
Quote:koszer wrote:
Quote:
Krisz wrote:
unfortunately no one here mentioned that I have to delete the Warp3d library for it to work ! Fortunately, a user wrote about it on another forum
There's a readme file in the Wazp3D archive. It says:
Quote:
INSTALLATION
Wazp3D-Prefs should be copied to your SYS:Prefs directory
Rename existing LIBS:Warp3D.library to LIBS:Warp3D.library-save
(...)
If you are not using WinUAE but a real Morphos machine
copy Wazp3D.library-morphos TO MOSSYS:Libs/Warp3D.library
copy Wazp3DPPC.library-morphos TO MOSSYS:Libs/Warp3DPPC.library
No need to
edit the readme file, just read it. You can rename old libs, or delete them, just don't leave them there untouched.
Quote:
The only problem with the Amiga and MAC prices you listed is that sooner or later the Amiga was not enough for anyone in its basic configuration and over time it needed RAM and processor upgrades and that cost a fortune.
And the upgrades for Macintosh computers were dirt cheap, right? :D
Quote:
I'm not saying Wipeout would run faster on a PPC Amiga, but I remember it running perfectly fine on my Amiga.
Ah, so it's not you who wrote this one?
Quote:
my Amiga with its 240Mhz processor ran games faster than MorphOS with the G5 2Ghz.
Are you just one person?
Quote:
In the past, serious editors that are still used by many today, such as LightWave, Blender, Cynema4d, were released for AmigaOS
Blender? Either you mean AmigaOS 4.x version of Blender or you confuse something again.
As for LightWave - maybe you'd like me to record a video how LW works on MorphOS? I'm sure it runs faster than on your 240 MHz Amiga.
read the description of wazp3d but I didn't see any part where it mentioned that the possible warp3d library should be deleted.It's true that I don't speak English, but as I've seen on other English forums, I'm not the only one who couldn't install it the first time.
Mac machines, for example, the Quadra, if I remember correctly, had a 40 processor as standard, while an Amiga 1200 had a 20 processor, so the Amiga had to be developed from scratch to be as fast as the Mac, so I think the Amiga can be considered a more expensive machine.
I understood most of the games to run faster
I remember Wipeout running at a decent speed but I don't know how much faster it was on the G5
I don't know how it runs on LW OS4 and MOS systems because I haven't had the chance to try it.
but let's be clear about one thing
LW and almost all the programs you use on the "great" MorphOS system now are all thanks to the Amiga developers
A machine or system is kept alive by the programs written on it!
No matter how good a system is, it doesn't have enough software support.
Many of you here criticize the Amiga and AmigaOS, and without the Amiga there would be no MorphOS.
The Amiga is "crap" but it's still good to use Amiga software, right?
I'm going to get a machine that can run AmigaOS4 and gain my own experience on which one works better MorphOS or AmigaOS
It's also more likable in terms of videos made about OS4, and I can't imagine it being as bad as some users here claim.
This is starting to be like when people argue about politics
everyone sticks to their own party and even if it doesn't work properly, they still don't see it or don't want to see it :)
I can say that when I was using os3.9 on my PowerAmiga I didn't have many problems with it.
I didn't have to restart every few minutes because the system would freeze
and the games ran at a pleasant speed
and the point is that there were a lot of applications on it
something that was specifically Amiga development and not porting
There's nothing wrong with using Amiga programs on MorphOS, just remember that MorphOS is also thanks to Amiga
and we shouldn't constantly criticize Amiga and AmigaOS
But I guess you won't agree with that either, and again I'm talking nonsense...