Priest of the Order of the Butterfly
Posts: 616 from 2003/11/24
From: Belgrade
> SATA: only one device
>...and no DMA.
Well, I am not sure about this, I believe it has DMA, its just not supported for OS4, Linux install can do some test and should score higher performance.
> Benefit for MorphOS team could be to focus just on AMCC460 SOC chip
AW>They can do this already on the Sam460ex. There's no obligation for an OS AW>running >on it to support the SM502 chip and the onboard SATA controller built AW>into the PPC460EX chip. MorphOS could support the Sam460ex equipped with AW>graphics card, sound card and SATA card. This way, there'd be no difference to AW>running MorphOS on the Sam460cr.
AW>MorphOS on Sam460ex with no support for the components missing on the Sam460cr AW>would equal full Sam460cr support, wouldn't it?
Exactly my thoughts, well versed.
AW>I guess the MorphOS Team has not wasted any time on supporting the SM502 or the AW>onboard SATA controller anyway.
I ment in their usability limits. 2D performance scares me of an idea to use it,
and sometimes its needed during Linux install.
See 2D performance http://hdrlab.org.nz/benchmark/gfxbench2d/OS/AmigaOS?start=1300 and chip itself doesn`t have any 3D.
Vox> as this was mention as obstacle
AW>What exactly and where?
As complexity to support, and you are right, not by developers.
Vox> 719e for SAM460c
AW>No, Sam460ex.
Thanks for corrections, I ll try to double-check what I post before I post
Hope its around the corner, as well as some PCI-E cards support, which would be even greater advancement for all. But having one more board (or two if we count CR and EX as two models) is also a nice improvement.
------------------------------------------
iMac G5 1GB with MorphOS and MacOS X
Lame PC with AmiKit XE, Linux, AROS and sadly Win11
Telegram MOS group: https://t.me/+zCLnwCvwhs4wMTI0
Steam https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198164221485/