MorphZone

Pegasos 2 set to 10 MBit/s?

sailor

# 26

Order of the Butterfly

Posts: 378 from 2019/5/9

From: Central Bohemi...

Stack speed on local lan with TCPSpeed:

Code:

Pegasos/MorphOS -> z10pe-w16/win7
System:Internet/TCPSpeed> tcpspeed c wasus
20971520 bytes read, 26806 kB/s
Reverse direction:
20897 kB/s
Pegasos/MorphOS -> A1X1000/AmigaOS
System:Internet/TCPSpeed> tcpspeed c amigaone
20971520 bytes read, 2321 kB/s
Reverse direction:
20603 kB/s

Pegasos/AmigaOS -> to z10pe-w16/win7
3.SystemAOS:Internet/TCPSpeed> TcpSpeed c wasus
20971520 bytes read, 11486 kB/s
Reverse direction:
 140 kB/s
Pegasos/AmigaOS -> to A1X1000/AmigaOS
3.SystemAOS:Internet/TCPSpeed> TcpSpeed c amigaone
20971520 bytes read, 11046 kB/s
Reverse direction:
 116 kB/s


A1X1000 -> to Pegasos/MorphOS
System:Internet/TCPSpeed> tcpspeed c pegasos
20971520 bytes read, 20603 kB/s
Reverse direction:
2321 kB/s
A1X1000 -> to z10pe-w16/win7
System:Internet/TCPSpeed> tcpspeed c wasus
20971520 bytes read, 30843 kB/s
Reverse direction:
19140 kB/s

AmigaOS3: Amiga 1200
AmigaOS4: Micro A1-C, AmigaOne XE, Pegasos II, Sam440ep, Sam440ep-flex, Sam460LE, AmigaOneX1000
MorphOS: Efika 5200b, Pegasos I, Sam460LE, Pegasos II, Powerbook G4, Mac Mini, iMac G5, Powermac G5 Quad

»24.05.20 - 16:47

connor

# 27
Priest of the Order of the Butterfly

Posts: 578 from 2007/7/29

But also 20MB/s is very slow for Gigabit.
»25.05.20 - 09:14

sailor

# 28
Order of the Butterfly

Posts: 378 from 2019/5/9

From: Central Bohemi...

Quote:

connor wrote:
But also 20MB/s is very slow for Gigabit.

26806 kB/s = 214 448 kbit/s = 209Mbit/s ~= 0.2 Gbit/s
Not so bad for old 1core/1.33GHz CPU.
My much modern BananaPro with 2Core/1.2GHz ARM has speed around 0.3 Gb/s.

And 209 Mbit is two times more than 100Mbit port ( and thus AmigaOS ) can have.
AmigaOS3: Amiga 1200
AmigaOS4: Micro A1-C, AmigaOne XE, Pegasos II, Sam440ep, Sam440ep-flex, Sam460LE, AmigaOneX1000
MorphOS: Efika 5200b, Pegasos I, Sam460LE, Pegasos II, Powerbook G4, Mac Mini, iMac G5, Powermac G5 Quad
»25.05.20 - 10:18

OffseT

# 29
Caterpillar

Posts: 23 from 2019/8/23

I have the same kind of performance, but only at the beginning.

In fact, the issue is not the speed, it is good. But after hours of usage transfers are becomes laggy (after 6-8 hours a 56K modem would be more efficient ^^). This is not the case with the 100MB interface. In short, max transfer rate of 1GB interface is always ok, but it is becoming unstable over the time (transfer going up and down all the time, with stalled periods).
»25.05.20 - 11:31

connor

# 30
Priest of the Order of the Butterfly

Posts: 578 from 2007/7/29

Ah, its Bytes and not bits, I read it wrong. Okay, then its better but tcpspeed is still theoretical. The stack and SANA drivers are much slower.
»25.05.20 - 15:59

duga

# 31
Butterfly

Posts: 78 from 2020/5/1

Quote:

connor wrote:
Ah, its Bytes and not bits, I read it wrong. Okay, then its better but tcpspeed is still theoretical. The stack and SANA drivers are much slower.

In what way is TCPSpeed "theoretical"?
»25.05.20 - 16:20